So, I think that ideally, we'd want to stick to Elisp, or some evolution thereof. Sadly, I don't see how to evolve Elisp into Scheme: they are closely related languages, but the differences are large enough that it seems hard to reconcile them.
> So this email is partly a: > - What now? What's the chance of work towards guilemacs moving over to > an official emacs git branch, and that port happening, anytime soon? > - Is anyone running it...
So, I think that ideally, we'd want to stick to Elisp, or some evolution thereof. Sadly, I don't see how to evolve Elisp into Scheme: they are closely related languages, but the differences are large enough that it seems hard to reconcile them.
yyamano のブックマーク 2014/09/17 13:18
このブックマークにはスターがありません。
最初のスターをつけてみよう!
Emacs Lisp's future (was: Guile emacs thread (again))
lists.gnu.org2014/09/17
> So this email is partly a: > - What now? What's the chance of work towards guilemacs moving over to > an official emacs git branch, and that port happening, anytime soon? > - Is anyone running it...
3 人がブックマーク・1 件のコメント
\ コメントが サクサク読める アプリです /