Google Groups: comp.lang.functional > Monads in Scheme?
I've been following with interest the discussion on how to explain Monads to people. The thing I seem to get hung up on the most is notation. Most of the explanations are rendered in Haskell, which I am not familiar with. I understand the general concepts, but not the details of the syntax, which makes the explanations and examples hard to parse.My question is: is it possible to render and/or expl
Monads for Schemers/Lispers | Metalinguistic Abstraction
I was originally writing a much more ambitious post that tried to introduce category theory and its uses, but have been having a hard time writing it. Unfortunately it is not something that I think can be easily explained tersely, although my attempts to do so have lead me to learn a lot more about category theory than I thought I’d ever want to know. Yet, I would still like to expose monads in a
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
