CSS Variables: The Architecture Backbone — Smashing Magazine
Using a preprocessor does not automatically upgrade one’s code: A thorough foundation in CSS is a prerequisite. In Karen Menezes’ experience, badly architected and overly abstracted preprocessor code is much harder to debug and maintain than a large CSS file created with basic structure and common sense. Variables can be seen as the backbone of a well-constructed project. Well-commented and well-d
Selector Specificity with CSS Preprocessors — SitePoint
Selector specificity is a real problem for most medium and large-sized projects, and as any other frequently recurring coding problem it needs to be addressed carefully. Even CSS-Tricks recently had an article on how to keep your CSS specificity low. And before you even try to say !important let me remind you that: CSS/everyday tip: if everything is !important, nothing is !important. – Tony Nelson
jsss-compiler - JavaScript-Based Style Sheets Preprocessor
jsss-compiler A altCSS: JavaScript-Based Style Sheets Preprocessor Home Usage Plugins Spec Everything is a module You can publish your mixin, and also you can install awesome mixin via npm. Easy to use Using npm. $ npm install -g jsss-compiler $ jsss style.js -o style.css Easy to Learn JSSS is a JavaScript tags.h1.color = 'red'; tags.h1.fontSize = '15px'; ids.foo.color = 'red'; ids.foo.fontSize =
Sass vs. Stylus: Who Wins the Minimal Syntax Battle?
Today we’re going to pit two CSS preprocessors head to head. You’ve no doubt seen lots of discussion about how SCSS compares to LESS, but where does Stylus, the new kid on the block, factor in? Can it possibly match the power and versatility of SASS? We’ll jump head first into both syntaxes and compare them side by side to see which is more logical and versatile. We’ll also talk about features and
Sass vs. LESS vs. Stylus: Preprocessor Shootout | Envato Tuts+
Wielding the true power of a CSS preprocessor is an adventure. There are countless languages, syntaxes, and features, all ready for use right now. In this article, we will be covering the various features and benefits of using three different preprocessors—Sass, LESS, and Stylus. Introduction Preprocessors produce CSS that works in all browsers. CSS3 preprocessors are languages written for the sol
CSS Preprocessor Benchmark
Results The timings for processing a 200 KB file of plain CSS (lower is better): Sass: 4.9 sec Sass: 2.5 sec (with warm .sass-cache) libsass: 0.2 sec Stylus: 1.7 sec Rework: 0.2 sec LESS: 0.5 sec r.js: 0.2 sec Libsass (a C++ implementation of Sass) and Rework turn out to be extremely fast. Background The speed of your CSS preprocessor is important for developer/designer ergonomics. The preprocessi
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
stylis
GitHub - topcoat/resin: A future facing CSS preprocessor made with postcss
6 Current Options for CSS Preprocessors — SitePoint
GitHub - yosssi/gcss: Pure Go CSS Preprocessor
GitHub - sass/libsass: A C/C++ implementation of a Sass compiler
http://www.nosleepforsheep.com/development/using-a-css-preprocessor/
https://www.urbaninsight.com/2012/04/12/ten-reasons-you-should-be-using-css-preprocessor
Ten Reasons You Should Be Using a CSS Preprocessor | Urban Insight
CSS Preprocessors. Comparing SASS, LESS and Stylus
GitHub - Subash/Prepros: Compile almost any preprocessing language with live browser refresh.
https://developers.google.com/web/tools/setup/workspace/setup-devtools
http://flippinawesome.org/2014/04/14/organizing-your-css-code-for-preprocessors/