experimentalworks » Blog Archive » Merge vs. Rebase – A deep dive into the mysteries of revision control
Merge vs. Rebase – A deep dive into the mysteries of revision control I remember the days when I started learning Git about two years ago. I crawled through all the available commands and read the man pages what they are for and I remember when I stumbled over rebase and stuck. After figuring out what it actually does, I start loving it, but didn’t understand it’s dangerousness until someday I som
Squashing commits with rebase
The git rebase command offers powerful options in its --interactive mode, commonly abbreviated as -i. One of the most popular features is the ability to squash commits, which merges smaller commits into larger ones. This can be useful when organizing your changes or preparing to finalize your work. Let’s explore how to do this effortlessly. Before we begin, a word of caution: Only squash commits t
git rebase: keeping your branches current
update: This post is now on my new blog. Where possible, I use git for my scm now. All software on dangerously incompetent is stored in git, and I do my personal yum work with git-cvsimport. One of the reasons I like git so much is git-rebase. Here’s an example of how it works: There is some upstream project that you wish to work on. You clone this upstream project when it is in state A, and make
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
