I'm trying to set up code coverage for phpunit for a particular directory. Can someone tell me what is the difference between: <filter> <whitelist> <directory suffix=".php">lib/</directory> </whitelist> </filter> and <filter> <whitelist addUncoveredFilesFromWhitelist="true"> <directory suffix=".php">lib/</directory> </whitelist> </filter> and <filter> <whitelist processUncoveredFilesFromWhitelist=
I just created a new Symfony 2.5 project with a regular composer command: php composer.phar create-project symfony/framework-standard-edition path/ 2.5.0 The Terminal asks me: Would you like to use Symfony 3 directory structure? What is this Symfony 3 directory structure? I have never seen it before... Is it new since 2.5? What are the benefits to using it? Is there any way to replicate this direc
I'm trying to create a local repository to test a composer project but composer create-project --repository-url=/path/to/packages.json vendor/project-name fails with [UnexpectedValueException] Unknown package has no name defined [...] My packages.json is: { "packages": { "vendor/project-name": { "dev-master": { "name": "vendor/project-name", "type": "project", "version": "dev-master", "source": {
I'm looking for a way to integrate my FuelPHP installation with behat. I have already a /features/ folder and the files required for Behat to work in my FuelPHP directory and I'm able to "play around" with some really basic stuff. What I'm looking for is a way to get the FuelPHP core functions and classes to work with Behat. Thank you in advance for your answers.
Changing Values: array_map cannot change the values inside input array(s) while array_walk can; in particular, array_map never changes its arguments. Array Keys Access: array_map cannot operate with the array keys, array_walk can. Return Value: array_map returns a new array, array_walk only returns true. Hence, if you don't want to create an array as a result of traversing one array, you should us
Update (May 14, 2010): It turns out, the russian developer Ilya Konyukhov picked up the gauntlet after reading this and created a new auth library for CI based on DX Auth, following the recommendations and requirements below. And the resulting Tank Auth is looking like the answer to the OP's question. I'm going to go out on a limb here and call Tank Auth the best authentication library for CodeIgn
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く