Introduction At the end of my Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger review, I wrote this. Overall, Tiger is impressive. If this is what Apple can do with 18 months of development time instead of 12, I tremble to think what they could do with a full two years. That was exactly two and a half years ago, to the day. It seems that I've gotten my wish and then some. Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard has gestated longer than any rel
![Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard: the Ars Technica review: Page 7](https://cdn-ak-scissors.b.st-hatena.com/image/square/0cf1f8a6182ec0ee725f6f13667cb84b966f3258/height=288;version=1;width=512/http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.arstechnica.net%2Fwp-content%2Fthemes%2Fars%2Fassets%2Fstatic%2Fars-logo-open-grey.png)