The Supreme Court building in Washington. (J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press) From today’s opinion by Justice Samuel Alito (for four justices) in Matal v. Tam, the “Slants” case: [The idea that the government may restrict] speech expressing ideas that offend … strikes at the heart of the
A law found to discriminate based on viewpoint is an “egregious form of content discrimination,” which is “presumptively unconstitutional.” … A law that can be directed against speech found offensi...
The Supreme Court building in Washington. (J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press) From today’s opinion by Justice Samuel Alito (for four justices) in Matal v. Tam, the “Slants” case: [The idea that the government may restrict] speech expressing ideas that offend … strikes at the heart of the
このブックマークにはスターがありません。
最初のスターをつけてみよう！
Opinion | Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms: There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment
A law found to discriminate based on viewpoint is an “egregious form of content discrimination,” which is “presumptively unconstitutional.” … A law that can be directed against speech found offensi...
2 人がブックマーク・1 件のコメント
＼ コメントが サクサク読める アプリです ／