Ruby's Implementation Does Not Define its SemanticsWhen I was first getting started with Ruby, I heard a lot of talk about blocks, and how you could "cast" them to Procs by using the & operator when calling methods. Last week, in comments about my last post (Ruby is NOT a Callable Oriented Language (It’s Object Oriented)), I heard that claim again. To be honest, I never really thought that much about it, and the idea of "casting" a block to a Proc
Life with Cygwin
