JSDoc as an alternative TypeScript syntax
As web development has embraced static typing during the past decade, TypeScript has become the default language of choice. I think this is great—I love working with TypeScript! But what if you can’t use TypeScript? You may encounter circumstances where you need to work in plain JavaScript, be it tooling constraints or a team member who does not like static typing. Under these circumstances, look
TypeScript vs. JSDoc JavaScript for static type checking - LogRocket Blog
There’s a debate to be had about whether using JavaScript or TypeScript leads to better outcomes when building a project. The advent of using JSDoc annotations to type a JavaScript codebase introduces a new dynamic to this discussion. In this guide, we’ll investigate what that looks like and come to an (opinionated) conclusion. If you’d talked to me in 2018, I would have solidly recommended using
TypeScript without TypeScript -- JSDoc superpowers
One way to think about TypeScript is as a thin layer around JavaScript that adds type annotations. Type annotations that make sure you don’t make any mistakes. The TypeScript team worked hard on making sure that type checking also works with regular JavaScript files. TypeScript’s compiler (tsc) as well as language support in editors like VSCode give you a great developer experience without any com
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
