rkd.me.uk - Clang vs. GCC - code coverage checking
April 2, 2016 Recently, I've been compiling some of the codebases I work on under Clang 3.8 instead of GCC 4.8, to take advantage of better compiler warnings and faster compilation speed (I've seen a 33% speedup, though I haven't tested this rigorously). Today, I got to grips with llvm-cov-3.8, and checked the coverage of my Clang-compiled test suite - and saw coverage failures, on a test suite I
Benchmarking LLVM/Clang 3.2, GCC 4.8, DragonEgg Compilers - Phoronix
Benchmarking LLVM/Clang 3.2, GCC 4.8, DragonEgg Compilers Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 9 November 2012 at 10:57 AM EST. Page 1 of 5. 7 Comments. Earlier this week I shared some updated benchmarks of the latest development code for LLVM/Clang 3.2 on an Intel Core i7 processor. Now from this same setup to complement the LLVM 3.1/3.2 benchmarks are results of the GCC 4.7.2 compiler, the
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
