Trevor Jackson, magazine editor1BMJ, London WC1H 9JP, UKtjackson{at}bmj.com In his 2010 BBC television series Wonders of the Solar System, the physicist Brian Cox made a remark that offended some horoscope lovers. “Despite the fact that astrology is a load of rubbish, Jupiter can in fact have a profound influence on our planet. And it’s through a force . . . gravity.” The BBC received a number of
The LHC has been built to investigate the fundamental building blocks of nature The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) on the Franco-Swiss border has made its first clear observation of a new particle since opening in 2009. It is called Chi_b (3P) and will help scientists understand better the forces that hold matter together. The as-yet unpublished discovery is <link> <caption>reported on the Arxiv pre-
This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (September 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) In studies of science communication, the information deficit model, also known as th
This webpage was generated by the domain owner using Sedo Domain Parking. Disclaimer: Sedo maintains no relationship with third party advertisers. Reference to any specific service or trade mark is not controlled by Sedo nor does it constitute or imply its association, endorsement or recommendation.
We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines: You have to credit our authors. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciD
onkimoさんの最近忙しくてブログを書けないのがと云うエントリを読んだ。 原則お書きになっていることに異論はなくて、だからこれから書くことは賛同でも反論でもなくて。なんと云うか、自分がどんなふうにとほほな気分になっているのか、と云う話。 その私が togetter記事に抱いた感想。それは、少数例だけから STSを使えないものとしてしまうのは、ちょっとどうかな、ということです。春日匠さんとあららさん、あと平川さんもかな、そんな少ないサンプルから STS全体を否定するのはやめた方がいいのではないか、と。これってこっちのエントリのコメント欄でTAKESANさんにも釘を刺された部分、ではあるんだけど。 でも例えばこの状況で沈黙を守っている科学技術社会論の専門家、って云うのもどうなんだろう、と思う。そう云うひとたちの、専門職としての出番はいったいいつなんだろう。 いやもちろん、こんなふうに思ってし
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く