By the way, this bug was not only the first to be described in the article "CMake: the case when the project's quality is unforgivable" but the very first genuine bug found by the V1040 diagnostic in a real open-source project (August 19, 2019). No. 9. Who's first? V502 Perhaps the '?:' operator works in a different way than it was expected. The '?:' operator has a lower priority than the '==' ope
![Top 10 bugs found in C++ projects in 2019](https://cdn-ak-scissors.b.st-hatena.com/image/square/a24848b75fa558b961da26765f6ce942ce2e3a69/height=288;version=1;width=512/https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.pvs-studio.com%2Fmedia%2Fdocx%2Fblog%2F0700_Top_10_C%2B%2B_Mistakes_2019%2Fimage1_thm_intoblank_1200x630.png%3Fver%3D10-18-2023-18-05-24)