To type or not to type: quantifying detectable bugs in JavaScript | the morning paper
the morning paper a random walk through Computer Science research, by Adrian Colyer Made delightfully fast by strattic To type or not to type: quantifying detectable bugs in JavaScript Gao et al., ICSE 2017 This is a terrific piece of work with immediate practical applications for many project teams. Is it worth the extra effort to add static type annotations to a JavaScript project? Should I use
The Shocking Secret About Static Types
The popularity of TypeScript has really exploded recently. I like TypeScript, and I like static types. It has some great features. It’s structural rather than nominal, meaning that it works basically like automatic duck typing rather than name or identity based type checking. That is a good fit for dynamic languages like JavaScript. What I don’t like is that a lot of people think that TypeScript s
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
bind(), call(), and apply() are untyped · Issue #212 · microsoft/TypeScript
