Please deprecate Mixins · Issue #4023 · facebook/reactYou signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. Dismiss alert
flummox/why-flux-component-is-better-than-flux-mixin.md at master · acdlite/flummox · GitHub
Why FluxComponent > fluxMixin In the React integration guide, I suggest that using FluxComponent is better than using fluxMixin, even though they do essentially the same thing. A few people have told me they like the mixin form more, so allow me to explain. My argument can be broken down into three basic points. Note that these aren't my original ideas, nor are they unique to Flummox — they are th
Higher-order Components
Enhance.js 0� ��U p� ��U import { Component } from "React"; export var Enhance = ComposedComponent => class extends Component { constructor() { this.state = { data: null }; } componentDidMount() { this.setState({ data: 'Hello' }); } render() { return <ComposedComponent {...this.props} data={this.state.data} />; } }; HigherOrderComponent.js @�؈�U import { Enhance } from "./Enhance"; class MyCompone
Mixins Are Dead. Long Live Composition
When React 0.13 came out, everybody freaked out. The introductory post made it clear that mixins are on their way out: Unfortunately, we will not launch any mixin support for ES6 classes in React. That would defeat the purpose of only using idiomatic JavaScript concepts. There is no standard and universal way to define mixins in JavaScript. In fact, several features to support mixins were dropped
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
