A statue of a "comfort woman" pictured outside of the Japanese embassy in Seoul A Japanese film festival will now show a documentary on forced wartime sex workers after its earlier decision to cancel the screening sparked a backlash.
タグ検索の該当結果が少ないため、タイトル検索結果を表示しています。
Abstract Through its "comfort women" framework, the World War II Japanese military extended its licensing regime for domestic prostitution to the brothels next to its overseas bases. That regime imposed strenuous health standards, which the military needed to control the venereal disease that had debilitated its troops in earlier wars. These "comfort stations" recruited their prostitutes (we limit
How a Harvard professor’s dubious scholarship reignited a history of mistrust between South Korea and Japan. Students in Seoul protested an article by J. Mark Ramseyer, who argued that Korean women taken by Japan during the Second World War had chosen to be prostitutes.Photograph by Chris Jung / NurPhoto / Shutterstock Read in Korean | 한국어 번역 보기 | Read in Japanese | 日本語で読む In January, I was outlin
Abstract: In December 2020, an article by J. Mark Ramseyer of Harvard University about the so-called ‘comfort women’ issue was published in the International Review of Law and Economics. This article caused widespread controversy amongst scholars, many of whom responded with serious criticisms of its content. On the other hand, some commentators argued that Ramseyer’s critics were seeking to suppr
Japan has apologized for the comfort women issue a number of times in the past, so why is Japan accused of never apologizing sincerely? In this video, I give context to Japan’s past apologies for the comfort women issue and talk about why taking legal responsibility is vital to a true apology. 日本は過去に何度も慰安婦問題の謝罪していますが、なぜ日本はきちんと謝罪していないと批判されるのでしょうか?この動画では、慰安婦問題に対する日本の過去の謝罪の背景を説明し、真の謝罪には法的責任を取ることが不可
In an academic paper published online late last year, Ramseyer claimed the women were sex workers who had voluntarily entered into contracts – a view supported by Japanese ultra-conservatives seeking to whitewash their country’s wartime atrocities. The article, titled Contracting for sex in the Pacific War, was due to appear in this month’s issue of the International Review of Law and Economics, b
This article is based on a talk that Satoko Oka Norimatsu gave at the seminar “The ‘History Wars’ and the ‘Comfort Woman’ Issue: Revisionism and the Right-wing in Contemporary Japan, U.S., and Canada,” held at the Institute of Asian Research, the University of British Columbia (Vancouver, BC), hosted jointly by the Centre of Korean Research and the Centre for Japanese Research, on November 21, 201
UPDATED: March 22, 2021 at 2:45 p.m. Harvard’s Reischauer Institute for Japanese Studies issued a statement last week calling on the publishing journal to “fully address” concerns raised around Harvard Law professor J. Mark Ramseyer’s contentious article on “comfort women,” and condemning online harassment that has stemmed from the controversy. Since Ramseyer’s forthcoming article in the Internati
SEOUL, South Korea — A paper by Harvard Law School Japanese legal studies professor J. Mark Ramseyer that claims sex slaves taken by the Imperial Japanese Army during World War II were actually recruited, contracted sex workers generated international controversy, academic criticism, and student petitions at Harvard this week. The paper, “Contracting for Sex in the Pacific War,” made headlines acr
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く