It’s 2016: and BTRFS could really be your next filesystem
Switching to a new filesystem is never a task that is done with a light heart. We have our own trusted good old filesytem, that has maybe limits in features and performance, but has never let us down. New filesystems are available, and they promise wonderful things. But as much as we are fascinated by them, the big Q “Should I trust it?” comes to mind when we just start thinking about moving to a
ZFS, BTRFS, XFS, EXT4 and LVM with KVM – a storage performance comparison
ZFS, BTRFS, XFS, EXT4 and LVM with KVM – a storage performance comparison Virtual machines storage performance is a hot topic – after all, one of the main problem when virtualizing many OS instances is to correctly size the I/O subsystem, both in term of space and speed. Of course performance is not the only thing to consider: another big role is played by flexibility and ease to use/configure. So
Bitrot and atomic COWs: Inside “next-gen” filesystems
The raid5 array didn't notice or didn't care about the flipped bit in Finn's picture any more than a standard single disk would. The next-gen btrfs-raid1 system, however, immediately caught and corrected the problem. The results are pretty obvious. If you care about your data, you want a next-gen filesystem. Here, we'll examine two: the older ZFS and the more recent btrfs. What is a “next-generati
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
BTRFS restoring a corrupt filesystem from another "tree location" - infotinks
Synology NASがビジネス機能を強化、最新OS「DSM 6.2 beta」と最新データ保護機能を試す【イニシャルB】
Re: Large files, nodatacow and fragmentation — Linux BTRFS
Defragment your Synology BTRFS Volume and improve performance! – Tyler Made
ext4 or btrfs on Synology
Btrfs options on existing shared folders - Synology Forum
Create a btrfs RAID
