Foreman: Use different Procfile in development and production
I have a homemade Sinatra application for which I intend to use Heroku to host it. I use foreman and shotgun in development, with the following Procfile: web: shotgun config.ru -s thin -o 0.0.0.0 -p $PORT -E $RACK_ENV It works great with both development and production. But the thing is, I don't want to use shotgun in production since it's too slow. Can we use separate Procfile configurations for
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
How do I merge multiple JSON objects in one file ruby
Installing pow rack server from source on 32bit CPU
Pow config.ru for serving static files outside of the public directory?
How to run Pow.CX alongside MAMP and VirtualHostX
pdu - Redundant power solution in datacenter rack - Stack Overflow
how can I save the form responses in a JSON file in ruby?
How can I save the form responses in a JSON file in ruby - Stack Overflow
ruby - How would I make an admin user with rack? - Stack Overflow
How can I generate a link/route/path in Roda?
What's the difference between Rack and Passenger?
How to start Sidekiq Web UI on public 0.0.0.0?
Making a Rack CLI
Disable Rack::CommonLogger without monkey patching
CORS issues with vue/node to rack/thin via nginx
How skip config.middleware.use for a specific controller action in Rails 5
Rspec + Capybara + Rack::Test — disable cookies
Rspec/Sinatra Modular vs Classical styles
How does the Rack::Request #params method work in regard to 'super'?
How to authenticate users using devise in rails middleware?