Closures in Tcl
While closely following the discussions spawned from the recent Tcl/Tk 9.0 release, I've noticed a point that keeps coming up: the absence of closures. Usually the cue for every Tcl hacker in the world (a very large mob, let me tell you) to start showcasing various contraptions to emulate them. So here's my turn. What kind of closures §But first, let me explain that what I think of when I read the
Implementing Type Systems as Macros
There’s a neat paper Type Systems as Macros by Chang, Knauth, and Greenman [1] that describes how to implement a typed language using an untyped host language and macro expansion. The paper is neat, but I found the code hard to follow—the paper uses a compact notation that’s convenient for print, but not so much for reproducing on one’s own. This post is my attempt to implement and explain in more
Gerbil Scheme
Objective Language Integrated MetaObject Protocol Class-based Object Orientation Interfaces with Runtime Specialization Systems Language Tiny Microkernel Integrated FFI Optimizing Native Compiler Static Binaries Modern Scheme Implementation Supports current R*RS standards and common SRFIs State of the Art Macro and Module System Fully exposes itself to the programmer
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
Closures in Tcl | Hacker News
Bitbucket
Implementing Type Systems as Macros | Lobsters
termlisp: A lisp dialect based on pattern matching and term rewriting | Lobsters
GitHub - mighty-gerbils/gerbil: Gerbil Scheme
Gerbil Scheme – A Lisp for the 21st Century | Hacker News