Re: The Case for Rust (in the base system)
Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: The Case for Rust (in the base system)" Reply: Robert R. Russell: "Re: The Case for Rust (in the base system)" In reply to: Alan Somers : "Re: The Case for Rust (in the base system)" Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ] From: David Chisnall <theraven_at_FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:13:30 UTC On 21 Jan 2024, at 16:04, Alan Somers <aso
Re: The Case for Rust (in the base system) | Lobsters
Assuming this would focus more on Rust, I did not expect the ending discussion on Lua. Finally, one of the key things that we found was that a lot of projects used C/C++ out of inertia. They don’t have peak memory or sub-millisecond-latency constraints and could easily be written in a managed language, often even in an interpreted one. We have Lua in the base system. I’d love to see a richer set o
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
FreeBSD considers Rust in the base system | Lobsters