HugeDomains.comCaptcha security check justcramer.com is for sale Please prove you're not a robot View Price Processing
Falcon | The minimal, fast, and secure web framework for Python
# sample.py import falcon class QuoteResource: def on_get(self, req, resp): """Handle GET requests.""" quote = { 'author': 'Grace Hopper', 'quote': ( "I've always been more interested in " "the future than in the past." ), } resp.media = quote app = falcon.App() app.add_route('/quote', QuoteResource()) $ pip install falcon gunicorn $ gunicorn sample:app Fast Falcon is a blazing fast, minimalist Py
WSGI and truncated chunked response bodies
I may be almost through with WSGI. While it has certainly worked for a number of my close-to-the-wire HTTP projects over the years, I seem finally to have reached an edge case where — as a standard — it cannot guarantee that I even return a correct response to browsers! The great triumph of WSGI is that Python for the Web was suddenly pluggable. Whether you wrote your application as a raw WSGI cal
Kozea/w · GitHub
Description w is as for now a proof of concept of an independant web debugger for wsgi project (implemented as a wsgi middleware). Unlike other web debuggers, w is based on the python bdb debugger framework. (The one used by pdb) This allows step by step debugging during the rendering of the page as well as exception inspection in the very state the exception occured. How is it possible ? WebSocke
Starman vs. uWSGI: PSGI server performance comparison | bitrate
This benchmark is about Perl PSGI web application servers but the story starts with Python. I needed to deploy a Python based web application on a server running�nginx. I was not fully up to date about the current WSGI application server offerings and therefore searched for some comparisons. I found a comprehensive WSGI server benchmark�by Nicholas Pi�l�which was very interesting, although slightl
WSGI Web Servers Bench Part 2
Last week I published a bench on Circus and I had some good feedback in the comments. We ended up saying that the app I was benching was hammering the disk too much to provide results that were accurate. Following AdamSkutt suggestions, I've modified the benched app so it would do I/O-bound tasks without hitting the disk, by exchanging data with a thread through a pipe. The new app does the follow
Chaussette WSGI Server — Chaussette 0.1 documentation
Chaussette WSGI Server¶ Chaussette is a dead-simple WSGI server that can run against already opened sockets. The main use case is to delegate the processes and sockets management to Circus. Usage¶ Chaussette provides a console script you can launch against a WSGI application, like any WSGI server out there: $ chaussette myapp Application is <function myapp at 0x104d97668> Serving on localhost:8080
WSGI Web Servers Bench
Circus is now able to bind and manage sockets, and in cunjunction with Chaussette you can run a full web stack behind your favorite Web Server (Nginx, Apache etc.) -- read more about Circus stacks here. In other words, Circus can spawn as many Chaussette processes as you want, each one will act as a web worker: they'll all accept requests on the same socket. Why would you want to do this? Because
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
