TruffleRuby on the Substrate VM - Kevin Menard's Weblog
Test suites like this are generally hard on optimizing runtimes. They always start in a cold state, they run for a short period of time, and in the case of JVM-based languages they incur a high degree of overhead when spawning new processes. For this test suite, which has 2,121 specs and 3,824 assertions, TruffleRuby on the SVM is 6.6 times faster than TruffleRuby on the JVM, shaving almost a full
OpenJDK: Graal
Graal Project a quest for the JVM to leverage its own J Mission The Graal OpenJDK project grew out of the Maxine VM project. In the context of the Maxine VM, Graal demonstrated that a compiler written in Java (with all its software engineering advantages) could generate highly optimized code without compromising on compile times. Graal was then spun off as an OpenJDK project in 2012 to bring these
Benchmarking a Go AI in Ruby: CRuby vs. Rubinius vs. JRuby vs. Truffle – a year later
Thoughts on different Ruby implementations Let’s wrap this up with a couple of thoughts on the different implementations: TruffleRuby TruffleRuby is making steady and great progress, which I’m thoroughly impressed with. To be honest, I was wondering if its performance increased since the last benchmark as I was worried that implementing new Ruby features would lead to decreased performance. Seeing
[jruby] TruffleRuby Status, start of 2017
Chris Seaton chris at chrisseaton.com Sat Jan 14 20:39:03 JST 2017 Previous message: [jruby] JRuby 1.7.25 & 26 - redhat 7 issues with Process.spawn & kill Next message: [jruby] Deoptimization Strategy Document Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] Hello all, This year has been a real turning point for JRuby+Truffle as we continue to progress on completeness and begin to ru
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
GraalVM - Wikipedia
