A Worst Case for Functional Programming?
programming in the twenty-first centuryIt's not about technology for its own sake. It's about being able to implement your ideas. Several times now I've seen the following opinion: For anything that's algorithm-oriented or with lots of math, I use functional programming. But if it's any kind of simulation, an object-oriented solution is much easier. I'm assuming "simulation" means something with l
C is Lower Level Than You Think
programming in the twenty-first centuryIt's not about technology for its own sake. It's about being able to implement your ideas. Here's a bit of code that many new C programmers have written: for (int i = 0; i < strlen(s); i++) { ... }The catch is that strlen is executed in each iteration, and as it involves looking at every character in search of a null, it's an unintentional n-squared loop. The
Purely Functional Retrogames, Part 1
programming in the twenty-first centuryIt's not about technology for its own sake. It's about being able to implement your ideas. When I started looking into functional languages in 1998, I had just come off a series of projects writing video games for underpowered hardware: Super Nintendo, SEGA Saturn, early PowerPC-based Macintoshes without any graphics acceleration. My benchmark for usefulness
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
