These shapes were even sanctioned by an early US version of the ISO 646 standard (ANSI X3.4, also known as ASCII), which defined 0x27 as “apostrophe (closing single quotation mark; acute accent)”, but they should already have been changed when the fonts were extended to cover ISO 8859-1, which added a separate acute accent at 0xB4. One obviously cannot have both 0x27/0x60 and 0x60/0xB4 as mutually
![ASCII and Unicode quotation marks](https://cdn-ak-scissors.b.st-hatena.com/image/square/0dd75beef52f4f08b8cd05d2b580ed4e14a9fda6/height=288;version=1;width=512/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cl.cam.ac.uk%2F~mgk25%2Fucs%2Fnt-font.gif)