DOI 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27532v1 Published 2019-02-13 Accepted 2019-02-13 Subject Areas Ethical Issues, Science Policy Keywords predatory publishing, journal whitelists and blacklists, professional standards, ethics, open access, business practices, peer review, transparency, scholarly communication Copyright © 2019 Strinzel et al. Licence This is an open access article distributed under the te
Introduction The movement to provide open access (OA) to all research literature is now over fifteen years old. In the last few years, several developments suggest that after years of work, a sea change is imminent in OA. First, funding institutions are increasingly mandating OA publishing for grantees. In addition to the US National Institutes of Health, which mandated OA in 2008 (https://publica
PeerJ Peer-Reviews Now Have DOIs by PeerJ Staff | May 6, 2014 | regular Since our launch, PeerJ has given authors the option of publishing the peer-reviews for their articles (and approximately 80% of our authors have chosen to do so). These public reviews have always had a unique URL (and hence have been citable by that URL), however we are pleased to say that we have now applied DOIs to all of o
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く