What is science and why should we care? — Part III
Let’s look at this in context of this statement from part II: “And here, it seems to me, is the crux of the conflict between religion and science. Not the religious rejection of specific scientific theories (be it heliocentrism in the 17th century or evolutionary biology today); over time most religions do find some way to make peace with well-established science..” This damning with faint praise
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
Brontosaurus and the nature of philosophy
Exploring genetic causation in biology
New Scientia Salon collection: Scientistic Chronicles
Sam Harris and the Demarcation Problem
The false dichotomy of trigger warnings
Smolin on mathematics
p-zombies are inconceivable. With notes on the idea of metaphysical possibility.
Is quantum mechanics relevant to the philosophy of mind (and the other way around)?
Is there (still) a continental-analytic divide in philosophy?
The Art of Darkness
What is science and why should we care? — Part II
What is science and why should we care? — Part I