Why Dart is not the language of the future | Rafaël Garcia-Suarez [blogs.perl.org]

So I've been looking at the Dart language specification recently published by Google (draft version 0.01). So far, I'm not really enthusiastic. Here's my reading notes. Class-based OO and Interfaces At first glance Dart code looks like Java (and nothing's wrong with that, I'm not going to criticize a language based on my idiomatic preferences). The syntax is very similar, with the dot to invoke me

[ruicc]

Dartの型は本当に意味が分からない。初めはClojureの型の様なものかと思ったのだけど。

[yayugu]

true以外全部偽な値ってのはヤバいな。falseとnil以外全部真なRubyと真逆で、そうするとstr = get(); if(str) ...... みたいな書き方ができなくなって条件分岐の記述がやたら冗長になりそう

[kazuhooku]

"Dart fails to provides the advantages of static languages, without compensating by the flexibility of dynamic languages"

[nisemono_san]

Dartが流行らないわけ

[rawwell]

""The worst of both worlds: Dart fails to provides the advantages of static languages, without compensating by the flexibility of dynamic languages. Nothing has been learned from the dynamic language renaissance of the last ten years; nothing from the functional world; nothing even from the slick co