Vanilla Rails is plenty

A common critique of Rails is that it encourages a poor separation of concerns. That when things get serious, you need an alternative that brings the missing pieces. We disagree. I have often heard this: vanilla Rails can only get you so far. At some point, apps become unmaintainable, and you need a different approach that brings the missing pieces, because Rails encourages a poor separation of co

[iga_k]

めっちゃわかる。豊かなドメインモデルでがんばっていきたい。

[diveintounlimit]

“If we aren’t careful, we might start to treat Services as our modeling “silver bullet.””

[ohbarye]

“a recurring problem in our industry is that people get very dogmatic when translating those into code.” "it (37signals' code) is the best incarnation of DDD principles I’ve seen, even if it doesn’t use most of its building blocks."