Linked Open Vocabularies (LOV)mso-em - MSO-EM: Ontologies for modelling, simulation, optimization (MSO) and epistemic metadata (EM)
GitHub - patcg-individual-drafts/topics: The Topics API
Note that this is an explainer, the first step in the standardization process. The API is not finalized. The parameters below (e.g., taxonomy size, number of topics calculated per week, the number of topics returned per call, etc.) are subject to change as we incorporate ecosystem feedback and iterate on the API. document.browsingTopics() returns an array of up to three topics, one from each of th
OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer (Second Edition)
OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer (Second Edition) W3C Recommendation 11 December 2012 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-primer-20121211/ Latest version (series 2): http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/ Latest Recommendation: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-primer Previous version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/PER-owl2-primer-20121018/ Editors:Pascal Hitzler, Wright State University Markus Krötz
SPARQL Anything
Uplift, then transform! SPARQL Anything uses a unique data schema called Facade-X. Facade-X is a simplistic meta-model that allows transformers to produce RDF from diverse data sources without the need of a domain vocabulary. This is a generic example of a Facade-X data object: @prefix fx: <http://sparql.xyz/facade-x/ns/> . @prefix xyz: <http://sparql.xyz/facade-x/data/> . @prefix rdf: <http://www
Three recommendations to enable Annotations on the Web
The Web Annotation Working Group has just published a Recommendation for Web Annotation in the form of three documents: Web Annotation Data Model—specification describes a structured model and format, in JSON, to enable annotations to be shared and reused across different hardware and software platforms. Common use cases can be modeled in a manner that is simple and convenient, while at the same t
W3C Web Annotation Working Group
Warning: this Working Group is now closed. It has published its Recommendations and Working Group Notes on the 23rd of February 2017. For further discussions on the evolution of Web Annotation technologies at W3C, possible errata, etc, please join the W3C Open Annotation Community Group. Web Annotation Working Group The W3C Web Annotation Working Group is part of the Publishing@W3C, but the scope
Firefox's Optimized Zip Format: Reading Zip Files Really Quickly
Firefox's Optimized Zip Format: Reading Zip Files Really Quickly This post is about minimizing amount of disk IO and CPU overhead when reading Zip files. I recently saw an article about a new format that was faster than zip. This is quite surprising as to my mind, zip is one of the most flexible and low-overhead formats I’ve encountered. Some googling showed me that over past 11 years people have
CloudEvents
cloudevents A specification for describing event data in a common way Why CloudEvents? Events are everywhere, yet event publishers tend to describe events differently. Consistency The lack of a common way of describing events means developers have to write new event handling logic for each event source. Accessibility No common event format means no common libraries, tooling, and infrastructure for
JSON Reference
Internet Engineering Task Force P. Bryan, Ed. Internet-Draft Salesforce.com Intended status: Informational K. Zyp Expires: March 20, 2013 SitePen (USA) September 16, 2012 JSON Reference draft-pbryan-zyp-json-ref-03 Abstract JSON Reference allows a JSON value to reference another value in a JSON document. Status of this Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions o
JSON Schema - Specification [#section]
The current version is 2020-12! The previous version was 2019-09. Specification documentsSee also the release notes / change log (Work in progress). The specification is split into two parts, Core and Validation. We also publish the Relative JSON Pointers spec although it's not currently used by Core or Validation in any significant way.
Excel設計書を抹殺したくて4年前にWiki設計書を導入したら、意外とちゃんと開発回ってた話。 - Qiita
初めましてこんにちは。 最近コードレビューの記事書いたら、Excelベースだったことを理由に Qiitaコメントとはてブで徹底的に燃やされたおじさんです。 いやね、僕だって使いたくて使ってるわけではなくてね、 できることなら使いたくないんですよ。 というわけで名誉挽回のために脱Excelできた話、 それも日本の三大悪三大風習に数えられるExcel設計書を抹殺した話を書きます。 (2/25修正：悪は言いすぎました。訂正します。） Growi 最高。 またの名をExcel方眼紙。 エクセルのセルの縦横を同じくらいの大きさに調整し方眼紙のようにして、 そこに設計書として文字と図と表を記載する方式。 メリット 一つのファイルに文字と図と表がまとめて記載できる テキストでは文字は書けても図と表が書けない Wordでは、文字と図表エリアとを2列表示するのが難しい できなくはないが面倒くさい UMLモデ
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
What is Cedar?
GitHub - w3c/rdf-star-wg: RDF-star Working Group
create the repositories for each spec · Issue #10 · w3c/rdf-star-wg
OWL 2ウェブ・オントロジー言語ドキュメント概要(第2版)
Ranking in Google Since The Advent of The Knowledge Graph
RDF-star and SPARQL-star
About Gluon
GitHub - w3c/rdf-star: RDF-star specification
オープンソースになったGitHub OpenAPI仕様 (ベータ)
