If all these new DBMS technologies are so scalable, why are Oracle and DB2 still on top of TPC-C? A roadmap to end their dominance.
(This post is coauthored by Alexander Thomson and Daniel Abadi) In the last decade, database technology has arguably progressed furthest along the scalability dimension. There have been hundreds of research papers, dozens of open-source projects, and numerous startups attempting to improve the scalability of database technology. Many of these new technologies have been extremely influential---some
The problems with ACID, and how to fix them without going NoSQL
The problems with ACID, and how to fix them without going NoSQL (This post is coauthored by Alexander Thomson and Daniel Abadi) It is a poorly kept secret that NoSQL is not really about eliminating SQL from database systems (e.g., see these links). Rather, systems such as Bigtable, HBase, Hypertable, Cassandra, Dynamo, SimpleDB (and a host of other key-value stores), PNUTS/Sherpa, etc. are mostly
ParAccel and their puzzling TPC-H results
[Warning: the ParAccel TPC-H results referred to in this post have since been challenged by a competitor and found to be in violation of certain TPC rules (I cannot find any public disclosure of which specific rules were violated). These results have since been removed from the TPC-H Website, as of Sep 24th 2009.] At SIGMOD last week, I was chatting with Mike Stonebraker (chatting might be the wro
1
リリース、障害情報などのサービスのお知らせ
最新の人気エントリーの配信
処理を実行中です
j次のブックマーク
k前のブックマーク
lあとで読む
eコメント一覧を開く
oページを開く
